So what did we handle to agree with the EU?

It’s the document the (political) world has actually been waiting on– and it’s feared to be no fewer than 2,000 pages long.

Today EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier and his British counterpart Lord Frost were still combing through the Brexit trade deal, line by line.

Talks in Brussels were concentrated on the details of fishing rights however both sides have indicated a Christmas Eve deal will be announced, bringing an end to months of wrangling just a week prior to existing trading arrangements expire.

Some feared it would never materialise. However the world might quickly finally see the agreement– which will form every element of Britain’s future relationship with the EU.

Analysis of the deal-in waiting by the UK Government recommends it ‘won’ in talks on 43 per cent of the ‘key problems’ in the talks. It labels a more 40 percent at compromises for both sides, with just 17 per cent down as ‘EU wins’.

Almost a year in the making, the deal has actually involved numerous officials working round the clock to concur its terms. So, what are the essential locations– and what will we be registering to?

EU chief arbitrator Michel Barnier (3rd from left) and his British counterpart Lord Frost were still combing through the Brexit trade offer

Analysis of the deal-in waiting by the UK Federal government suggests it ‘won’ in talks on 43 per cent of the ‘crucial issues’ in the talks. It identifies a more 40 per cent at compromises for both sides, with just 17 percent down as ‘EU wins’.


Last night it appeared that Britain had actually offered ground on this major sticking point to get an offer done.

Fishing rights have actually been the most intractable part of the negotiations. Boris Johnson made clear that Britain would be an independent seaside state in charge of access to its own waters– with UK fishermen able to catch a far higher proportion of the offered fish than their EU competitors.

Brussels had required unfettered access to Britain’s waters for a years. The UK had provided a three-year shift period.

According to early reports, what we have ended up reclaiming is 25 percent of the EU’s fishing quota– with modifications phased in over five-and-a-half years.

Downing Street says this will suggest we are capturing two-thirds of the fish in our waters by 2026– however there is no doubt that this compromise appears nearer the EU’s beginning position than ours, at least in the short term.

The Government document, seen by the Guido Fawkes website, firmly insists that the circumstance is a shared compromise – the UK offered ground on the size of the quotas, the EU offered ground on how long they have gain access to for.

Nevertheless, possibly in a bid to save face, French sources recommended the scenario was a win for the EU. A French government source stated UK arbitrators had made ‘big concessions’ on fisheries.


Another bone of contention has been Brussels’ fear that Britain could make the most of leaving the bloc by lowering standards to make its firms more competitive.

The EU was likewise fretted that the UK might provide more financial help to its own firms.

As an outcome, it required a ‘level playing field’ to prevent a race to the bottom on problems such as employees’ rights and environmental policy.

It also wanted Britain to continue to accept a slew of EU rules.

The UK said this would position an ‘existential danger’ to its sovereignty. Britain said it would opt for No Offer instead of face being tied to EU rules after Brexit.

Last night it appeared that Britain had given ground on this major sticking point to get an offer done. Visualized: Boris Johnson with the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, on the steps of No10 Downing Street earlier this year

In the end, both celebrations appear to have concurred a typical baseline of policies on some concerns, listed below which neither side will plunge.

However, the EU has likewise been insisting that if one side raised requirements and the other did not, the latter should be punished if failure to maintain led to unreasonable competition.

Instead, it is most likely the 2 sides have actually concurred an independent mechanism to deal with matters if one side diverges too far from typical standards. This would eventually make judgments on retaliatory tariffs in the event of a conflict.

The Federal government declares it ‘won’ 5 of the 8 essential sticking points in this part of negotiations, including EU law, the ability of the UK to set its own subsidy rates, competition and tax rules.


A related– and tough– concern is that of the European Court of Justice. British sources showed that the ECJ will have no say in the resolution of any rows.

This had actually been a key need from Westminster, to prevent the erosion of British sovereignty.

Brussels conceded that it could not have the unilateral right to enforce penalties on Britain– although it did press hard for a strong and independent arbitration system.

The EU had intended to punish Britain for ‘breaking rules’ in one location by countering in another– enabling them to impose tariffs or taxes in an unassociated sector to cause the most harm possible.


In the end, Britain and the EU appear to have actually concurred a zero-tariff and zero-quota routine– a considerable triumph for Mr Johnson. Trade with the EU represent 43 percent of the UK’s exports and 51 percent of its imports.

Another bone of contention has actually been Brussels’ fear that Britain could benefit from leaving the bloc by decreasing requirements to make its firms more competitive. Pictured: European Chief Mediator Michel Barnier

The prospect of No Deal– and trading with Brussels on World Trade Company terms, as Australia does– triggered fears of huge additional expenses for businesses, which would have been passed on to the public.

As talks reached the sharp end, ministers accepted that No Deal would result in numerous essential food items costing more at the grocery store.


Sources state there has actually been some level of arrangement on the essential problem of security co-operation.

Britain had wanted to preserve the exact same access to shared databases that it has now– only for the EU to claim this was not an alternative for non-members.

Ultimately, the UK appears to have protected greater access than it would have received in a No Offer Brexit.

The UK Federal government file states the agreement ‘offers quick and efficient exchange of rap sheets data between UK and EUMS through shared technical infrastructure (European Crook Records Info System (ECRIS)).’.

There will also be ‘fast and efficient exchange of nationwide DNA, fingerprint and car registration data’.

The UK also appears to have actually been given higher access to Europol than other non-EU nations due to the fact that of its past contribution to the criminal activity agency. There is also a fast-track contract on extradition.


striking a deal suggests Britons will discover it easier to take a trip to the continent than they would have if talks had failed.

It is also hoped that tourists will have access to healthcare facility treatment when travelling abroad.

The UK has actually argued that the European Health Insurance Card, or EHIC, ought to also continue to stand after the Brexit transition duration ends on December 31– sparing travelers the ordeal of arranging their own insurance coverage.

Check Also

Prince Philip dies: Archbishop Justin Welby will lead special

Advertisement The Archbishop of Canterbury led a solemn remembrance service for Prince Philip at Canterbury …